Â鶹´«Ã½

New ideas and findings are communicated to the world at large through publication, which makes responsible authorship an important concern. These resources from Â鶹´«Ã½ and various sources provide information on making sound choices in the course of authoring and disseminating knowledge.

Courses

• , Columbia University
• , Association of Health Science Libraries
• Searchpath Module 6: Citing Sources—WMU faculty can access the Searchpath course through WMU . Select Self Registration from the top row after logging in.

Additional resources

• , Indiana University

• , by Mark A. Fine and Lawrence A. Kurdek, 1993. American Psychologist, 48, 1141–1147.

• Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure, by K. Unger & J. Couzin, 2006. Science, 312(5770), 40-1. Waldo Library, General stacks, call number Q1. S35.

• Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail, by J. Couzin & K. Unger, 2006. Science, 312(5770), 38-43. Waldo Library, General stacks, call number Q1. S35.

• —A discussion about what constitutes plagiarism and how to avoid it by Georgetown University. Investigate how easy it is to unintentionally and inadvertently plagiarize.
• Rutgers University
• WMU Student Conduct—Academic Honesty
• —A tutorial about plagiarism for Â鶹´«Ã½s by Acadia University.

Professional guidelines

• , , American Psychological Association
• , American Chemical Society
• , updated February 2006. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)